Easier way to find scheduled monuments in your area if you find Magic Maps overly complicated.
https://ancientmonuments.uk/map#.YDBnsS3fWhB
Finding scheduled monuments - map
- Oxgirl
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:21 pm
- Location: Oxfordshire
- Has thanked: 1056 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
Sometimes I question my sanity but the unicorn and the gummy bear told me I’m fine
-
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 6:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1174 times
- Been thanked: 466 times
Just tried that out for near to where i detect, Cath.
A useful tool for other locations.
Thanks,
Dave.
A useful tool for other locations.
Thanks,

Dave.
- TerraEnglandia
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:01 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 314 times
- Contact:
How good is that! So much less faff than using Magic Maps. Thanks very much Cath. 

- TerraEnglandia
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:01 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 314 times
- Contact:
Edit: I picked up a 60 acre permission earlier this week, one of the fields is 150 metres from a Monument. It's actually in the next door field. That should be far enough away shouldn't it?TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:47 pmHow good is that! So much less faff than using Magic Maps. Thanks very much Cath.![]()
- Easylife
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:47 am
- Location: Valhalla
- Has thanked: 868 times
- Been thanked: 842 times
Magic map will show the actual boundary.TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 3:16 pmEdit: I picked up a 60 acre permission earlier this week, one of the fields is 150 metres from a Monument. It's actually in the next door field. That should be far enough away shouldn't it?TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:47 pmHow good is that! So much less faff than using Magic Maps. Thanks very much Cath.![]()

- Oxgirl
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:21 pm
- Location: Oxfordshire
- Has thanked: 1056 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
Agree you need to go to Magic Maps and then you are advised to stay 50m from the boundaryEasylife wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 4:06 pmMagic map will show the actual boundary.TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 3:16 pmEdit: I picked up a 60 acre permission earlier this week, one of the fields is 150 metres from a Monument. It's actually in the next door field. That should be far enough away shouldn't it?TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:47 pmHow good is that! So much less faff than using Magic Maps. Thanks very much Cath.![]()
![]()

Sometimes I question my sanity but the unicorn and the gummy bear told me I’m fine
- TerraEnglandia
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:01 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 314 times
- Contact:
On this particular field, there's a grass area (gallop) and the edge of it is 30 metres from the scheduled field. To the right of the edge, the field is worked. I've just been searching to try and find a definitive no go boundry distance, but I haven't found anything official so far. 50 metres has been mentioned here, I've also seen 20 metres distance mentioned elsewhere. Which is likely to be correct?
50 metres extends well into the field on this new permission.
50 metres extends well into the field on this new permission.

- Easylife
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:47 am
- Location: Valhalla
- Has thanked: 868 times
- Been thanked: 842 times
The only no go area is the actual monument itself. As they are not marked out just use your own judgement how close you search to it to be sure that you are not on it.TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:36 pmOn this particular field, there's a grass area (gallop) and the edge of it is 30 metres from the scheduled field. To the right of the edge, the field is worked. I've just been searching to try and find a definitive no go boundry distance, but I haven't found anything official so far. 50 metres has been mentioned here, I've also seen 20 metres distance mentioned elsewhere. Which is likely to be correct?

- Oxgirl
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:21 pm
- Location: Oxfordshire
- Has thanked: 1056 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
50 metres is what English Heritage advice. Where the boundary is clear then it is rather excessiveTerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:36 pmOn this particular field, there's a grass area (gallop) and the edge of it is 30 metres from the scheduled field. To the right of the edge, the field is worked. I've just been searching to try and find a definitive no go boundry distance, but I haven't found anything official so far. 50 metres has been mentioned here, I've also seen 20 metres distance mentioned elsewhere. Which is likely to be correct?
50 metres extends well into the field on this new permission.![]()
distance.jpg


Sometimes I question my sanity but the unicorn and the gummy bear told me I’m fine
- TerraEnglandia
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:01 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 314 times
- Contact:
The entire field that has the monument in is showing as being scheduled, it's quite a small field. There's the usual hedgeline on the border of it and then a single track drive leading to the farm on my permission. To the right of the track, there's a grass gallop (which I won't be detecting on), then the large worked field as mentioned. I think I should be fine. 

- Easylife
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:47 am
- Location: Valhalla
- Has thanked: 868 times
- Been thanked: 842 times
Just go for it as long as you know that you are not on the monument. Any surrounding distance is just advisory in case you are not sure of the actual boundary. Don't over think it.TerraEnglandia wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:24 pmThe entire field that has the monument in is showing as being scheduled, it's quite a small field. There's the usual hedgeline on the border of it and then a single track drive leading to the farm on my permission. To the right of the track, there's a grass gallop (which I won't be detecting on), then the large worked field as mentioned. I think I should be fine.![]()
